Abstract
Most people do not have a skincare problem. They have a sequencing problem.
The products are often reasonable. Bought individually, over time, each one solving something. What is missing is the logic connecting them: what goes on first, what cancels what out, what should not be used on the same night, and what is doing nothing because it never reaches living tissue.
That is the difference between a routine and a protocol. A routine is a collection. A protocol is an order of operations with a clinical reason behind each position.
Four Things Self-Assembly Usually Gets Wrong
Order. Actives are formulated to work at particular depths and particular pH ranges. Applied out of sequence, some are diluted, some are neutralised, and some sit on top of an occlusive layer they cannot cross.
Timing. Retinoids belong at night. Antioxidants and SPF belong in the morning. This is not preference. It is what the molecules do under UV and what they do without it.
Combination. Two products can each be well formulated and still be a poor pairing. Layering multiple exfoliating acids with a retinoid on the same night is the most common example, and the barrier damage it causes reads as sensitivity rather than as over-treatment.
Adaptation. Skin adjusts. A protocol that was correct in March may be wrong in August, and correct at 45 may be wrong at 55. A routine assembled once is rarely revisited.
What a Protocol Actually Specifies
For every step: what it does, when it is applied, where it sits in the order, and what to change if the skin reacts.
Aliangé runs two, and they are not variations on each other.
The AM Protocol is protective. Cleanse, regulate, antioxidant defence, SPF. The morning is about limiting the input load, particularly UV, the principal driver identified in photoageing research.
The PM Protocol is corrective. Cleanse, treat, signal, repair. Overnight is when renewal runs, and it is when retinoids and cellular signalling ingredients belong, away from light.
Both exist because skin does different work at different times of day. Running one protocol twice is running the wrong half twice.
Where the Analysis Comes In
The skin analysis exists to answer one question: which protocol, and at what intensity.
It asks about concern, current products, sun exposure and tolerance history, because those four together determine sequencing. Not to sell you more steps. Frequently the outcome is fewer, because the most common finding is not a missing product. It is two products working against each other and a barrier that has not been supported.
It takes a few minutes and produces a sequence with reasons attached.
The Step Most Protocols Are Missing
Two gaps recur more than any others: no barrier support, and no daily SPF.
Both are unglamorous. Neither produces a visible result in a fortnight. Both determine whether everything else in the protocol can work, because actives applied to a compromised barrier cause irritation instead of change, and correction applied without protection is undone daily.
If you take one thing from this and do not complete the analysis: add the barrier step and wear SPF. That does more than most product substitutions.
Written by Dr Alison Jamieson — MBBS, FRACGP, Dip Derm, cosmetic physician, with over 40 years treating Australian skin.
Leave a comment
This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.